The MP Paddy Scam 90 FIR case has become a major issue in Madhya Pradesh after the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) informed the Madhya Pradesh High Court that 90 FIRs have been registered in connection with alleged irregularities in paddy procurement and transportation across the state.
The development came during the High Court proceedings concerning allegations of large-scale irregularities in the procurement and movement of paddy. The EOW also submitted a status report covering the progress of investigations in the 90 cases.
90 FIRs Registered in MP Paddy Case
According to the EOW’s submission before the High Court, 90 FIRs have been registered in connection with alleged irregularities in paddy procurement and transportation.
The agency submitted the status of these investigations following directions from the High Court. The state government and the Madhya Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation sought additional time to submit detailed responses. The court granted six weeks for the replies and deferred the matter.
The EOW’s official FIR records also show multiple cases registered during 2026 across branches including Jabalpur, Bhopal and Rewa.
How Did the Alleged Paddy Scam Come to Light?
The issue gained significant attention following an investigation in Jabalpur district.
A public-interest litigation filed by the Nagrik Upbhokta Manch raised allegations concerning paddy procurement and transportation through the state Civil Supplies Corporation.
According to the High Court proceedings, an earlier inquiry in Jabalpur identified serious discrepancies between the quantity of paddy shown in records and the transportation capacity of the vehicles recorded for moving it.
The court record referred to an alleged embezzlement of ₹43.03 crore in Jabalpur, while media reports on the earlier inquiry had cited a figure of around ₹34 crore. The difference reflects different stages or descriptions of the investigation and should not be treated as a final established loss figure.
Paddy Transported on Bikes and Autos?
One of the most unusual allegations concerns transportation records.
The petition before the High Court alleged that records showed quantities ranging from 10 quintals to 200 quintals of paddy being transported using two-wheelers, three-wheelers and even passenger buses.
Such records raised questions about whether the transportation entries accurately represented the physical movement of paddy.
The allegations prompted the High Court to seek a wider investigation into whether similar irregularities had occurred in other districts of Madhya Pradesh.
High Court Orders Statewide Investigation
In August 2026, the Madhya Pradesh High Court directed a statewide inquiry into alleged paddy procurement irregularities.
The court directed collectors across the state to conduct similar investigations and submit reports. It also asked the Madhya Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation to file an affidavit concerning the action taken and directed the EOW to submit a status report.
The court’s action followed concerns that the alleged irregularities might not be limited to Jabalpur.
The petition had referred to investigations involving 27 districts, leading the court to seek broader verification.
Alleged Role of Millers, Transporters and Officials
The High Court record also refers to allegations involving different participants in the procurement chain.
According to the court document, an inquiry in Jabalpur identified alleged discrepancies involving rice millers, transporters and employees of government-related agencies.
The record stated that out of 46 rice millers examined in the Jabalpur inquiry, 43 were found by the inquiry to be involved in alleged embezzlement. These are allegations and investigation findings at this stage, not final criminal convictions.
Why the Case Matters for Farmers
Paddy procurement is important for farmers because government procurement at the Minimum Support Price (MSP) provides an assured market for eligible produce.
Any manipulation of farmer registrations, procurement records, transportation documents or payments could potentially affect the transparency of the procurement system.
Recent investigations in Madhya Pradesh have also identified other alleged irregularities in agricultural procurement, including cases involving the use of farmer identities in moong procurement.
This makes verification and transparency particularly important during procurement seasons.
What Happens Next?
The EOW has already submitted its status report on the 90 FIRs. The state government and Civil Supplies Corporation are expected to file detailed responses before the High Court.
Further proceedings could clarify:
- The status of individual FIRs
- The districts involved
- The financial impact established by investigations
- Whether additional cases are registered
- Action taken against accused persons
- Whether further statewide investigations are required
The legal process is ongoing, so the final findings should be distinguished from allegations contained in complaints, FIRs or investigation reports.
Conclusion
The MP Paddy Scam 90 FIR development has brought renewed attention to alleged irregularities in Madhya Pradesh’s paddy procurement and transportation system.
The EOW has told the High Court that 90 FIRs have been registered, while the court has sought wider information about the alleged irregularities across the state. The case originated from concerns raised over procurement and transportation records in Jabalpur and has since expanded into a broader statewide investigation.
As the investigation and court proceedings continue, the final responsibility of individuals or organisations involved will depend on evidence and the outcome of the legal process.